By Christine Eiser
"Double Take" is a drug schooling package deal produced by way of the dept of healthiness and Social defense (United Kingdom). This video package deal used to be dispensed for gratis to all secondary faculties catering to scholars from 11 years onwards in England and Wales in the course of 1986. This booklet reviews the result of a learn assessment of this academic package deal, quite when it comes to its acceptability to academics and scholars. The evaluate mentioned during this publication was once performed intentionally in the context of organizational and methodological regulations. the first crisis used to be much less with the capability effectiveness of "Double Take" below optimum stipulations. quite, the investigators have been drawn to the ways that academics themselves selected to undertake and combine the package deal inside current classes and with the limitations of scholars of their schools.
Read Online or Download Drug Education in Schools: An Evaluation of the “Double Take” Video Package PDF
Best addiction & recovery books
There's a deep desire for privateness schooling and expertise with which to teach the e-services undefined, and supply it the instruments to construct privateness conserving e-services. privateness safety for E-Services fulfills this want via reporting at the most recent advances in privateness security concerns and applied sciences for e-services, protecting vital fabric, corresponding to: shopper empowerment, assessing privateness hazards, safety applied sciences wanted for privateness safeguard, platforms for privateness coverage enforcement, or even tools for assessing privateness applied sciences.
At anybody time at the very least 5 million humans within the usa are experiencing the indicators of Obsessive-Compulsive sickness (OCD), a psychological ailment outlined by means of recurrent, unwelcome techniques (obsessions) and repetitive behaviors (compulsions) that OCD victims think pushed to accomplish. The OCD resolution booklet is an authoritative reference for those adults and their family, delivering sound suggestion and speedy solutions to their such a lot urgent questions.
This can be a 3-in-1 reference e-book. It provides a whole scientific dictionary overlaying hundreds of thousands of phrases and expressions in relation to drug abuse. It additionally provides large lists of bibliographic citations. ultimately, it presents info to clients on the best way to replace their wisdom utilizing quite a few web assets.
- Her Best-Kept Secret: Why Women Drink-And How They Can Regain Control
- Cannabis - A Medical Dictionary, Bibliography, and Annotated Research Guide to Internet References
- Steroid Nation: Juiced Home Run Totals, Anti-aging Miracles, and a Hercules in Every High School: The Secret History of America's True Drug Addiction
- Miles to Go Before I Sleep: My Grateful Journey Back from the Hijacking of Egyptair Flight 648
Extra info for Drug Education in Schools: An Evaluation of the “Double Take” Video Package
Similarly, the number of teachers who had seen "Double Take" was low. 4%), between 1 and 4 teachers had seen the video. 6%) had not organized any parents' evenings about drugs. 6% had organised more than one. 5%) stated that they had not yet organized parents' evenings but intended to in the future. The place of "Double Take" in the curriculum For each age-level of pupils (11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 14-15, 15-16 years) we tried to estimate (a) the number of curriculum hours devoted to drug education generally, and (b) the number of hours devoted to "Double Take" including the associated exercises.
These were (1) school (independent or comprehensive); (2) sex of respondent; (3) position of respondent in school; (4) whether or not the respondent had attended any courses on drugs education and (5) general attitude of respondent. There were a number of significant associations between the actions which would be taken if a pupil was found experimenting with drugs and the type of school. 01). 001). 05). We compared teachers in terms of their position in school (head teachers versus other). 05) than other teachers.
14 VS. 41 VS. 65 VS. 97 VS. 56 VS. 84 VS. 14 VS. 65 VS. 56 VS. 46 respectively). (c) Analyses of second questionnaire: ratings of dangerousness. In view of the larger number of subjects completing the second questionnaire, the larger number of items included, and the lack of any classgroup differences on relevant 'before' measures, the remaining analyses were conducted on the 'after' measures only. We first considered the ratings of how addictive and likely to kill were the 13 different substances.